The Leap of Faith

We recently installed a classic ropes course element out at the ROPES Course at Butler School – The Leap Of Faith.  Participants must climb up a tree, and can either stop at a platform that is 20 feet off the ground, or continue up to the 40 foot platform.  This element is HIGH, and when you feel the wind up on the top of the highest platform, things get pretty exciting!

We had our last group test out the element, and the kids had a great time!  The high school students from a local Greek Academy used the Leap of Faith as their final activity after a day on the ropes course.  We didn’t any great pictures this time, but a couple of shots can give you an idea of the element.  I will post better pics in the future…

leapoffaith1 The Leap of Faith

Standing on the 40 foot platform - getting ready to jump!

leapoffaith2 The Leap of Faith

Ready, Aim, Jump!

Let’s Not Call It Team Building

As a provider of team building, retreat facilitation, and experiential training for organizational improvement, I make a point of researching the trends in my industry.  With no shortage of information available on the internet, I am painfully aware of the confusion and the negative feedback that surrounds the ideas and the execution of activities under the umbrella of “team building”.

There are many companies that promote themselves as team building service providers.  Here are just a few I found when I did a search for ‘corporate team building’:

  • cooking
  • murder mystery
  • scavenger hunts
  • board breaking
  • bowling
  • paintball
  • fire walking
  • sailing
  • gym climbing
  • ropes courses
  • wacky olympics
  • bike building
  • pinewood derby racing
  • white water rafting

    and the list goes on…

Now, I’m a big fan of using a novel experience as part of a team building program, but I am skeptical about the level of facilitation and actual team development that goes on during these events.  If I was a client looking for a team building activity, here is what I would want to know:

What type of facilitation is going on during the ‘event?’  Do the facilitators know anything about group dynamics and team development, or are they simply experts at taking the group through the activity or experience?

How do the facilitators transfer whatever is learned during the off-site back to the real-world of the workplace?  Without some sort of debrief and discussion with regard to the group experience and the work experience, participants might as well be calling it recreation rather than team building.  Without a well facilitated discussion, the ‘team’ is not building anything!

Once you have taken part in this experience, what do you do for the follow up?  The number one complaint about even a well facilitated team building event is that while participants may have had fun and learned something about how to work more effectively as a team, as soon as they returned to the office on Monday, it was back to business as usual.  Without a proper follow-up, there is no long-term value.

Too many of these companies that offer experiences without facilitation are giving team building a bad name.  The only way a company off-site can hold any long-term value is if the experience is more than just bonding and fun.  Real value comes with building trust between the members of the group, learning how to communicate more effectively, working through conflict, and creating an environment where members are committed to the mission of the team.  When these goals are met, the team is ready to perform at its peak.

Let’s not lump together every activity that is offered for your company off-site and call it team building.  If an organizer knows the right questions to ask, they can usually differentiate between the experiences that will have lasting value and the ones that will be short-lived memories.  Although, I do have to admit – walking through fire sounds pretty cool…

Team Building Gets a Bad Rap

I just read another blog posting about how useless team building exercises are with regards to effective work teams. You know, the kind of article that starts out with a cliche about some ‘touchy-feely’ ice-breaker and what a waste of time it was. And have you seen the Geico commercial that shows the CEO taking a trust fall with the Gecko? Yikes! Team building really gets a bad rap!

It is unfortunate that there are so many poorly facilitated ‘team building’ programs out there. As a professional facilitator, I regularly hear from clients – and the blogosphere – about how ineffective their last company team building event was. I agree with the premise that ’silly ice breakers’ is not the way to build a high performing team, however, those ice breakers do serve an important purpose.

Ice breakers – silly or not – are designed to lower inhibitions. Inhibitions are what makes us hold back in both our introductions to one another and our daily working relationships. Lowering inhibitions creates an opportunity for a skilled facilitator to introduce techniques for building vulnerability-based trust between the members of the group. I don’t mean the ‘fall back and I’ll catch you’ cliche (although in some circumstances, that is still a powerful trust-building tool), but the kind of trust that allows individuals to step out of their comfort zone and suggest an idea that might be a flop, or might just lead to an innovation. The most effective teams have a bond that allows them to speak freely, listen actively, and remain open to new and possibly uncomfortable ideas. Professionally facilitated team building programs, as part of a broader team development effort, can create the space where innovation is commonplace – and sometimes an ice breaker is the way to get that process moving more quickly.

Trust is at the Root of Innovation

I work part-time as a school teacher at a local Montessori school here in Maryland.  My students are ages 3 to 14 years-old and one of the best parts of teaching them is the creativity and ingenuity they possess, seemingly without even trying.  They share their questions, ideas and dreams with me, and we all benefit from the experience.  The reason they tell me their ideas, no matter how outrageous they might be, is the bond of trust we share.  The kids know they can share their ideas with me without worrying about me judging or mocking them.  Trust lets us communicate freely, and the free flow of communication is where a creative idea has a chance to grow into an innovation.

Every one of us has the potential to think creatively.  Unfortunately, so many of us don’t have trust in ourselves and the people around us, so whatever germ of a creative idea we have, we rarely share with anyone.  Building trust is at the root of creating a space for sharing creative ideas and making room for innovation.  Teams that trust one another are more likely to take the risks necessary to float a new idea.  The expression “that idea is so crazy, it just might work!” isn’t mentioned in a group that does not trust its members.  A team that in search of innovation needs to first find trust.

For some great ways to build trust between the members of your group, check out our team building options

Ten Characteristics of Authentic Leaders

Ten Characteristics of Authentic Leadership

All of us have dealt with leaders, both effective and ineffective. Sadly, many of the people in charge are the latter. What are the skills and qualities that separate a good leader from a bad one?

First of all, it is important to create a working definition for leadership. Leadership is a set of skills and qualities that helps to motivate individuals and groups toward a common goal. Leadership can come from the assigned leader of the group, or from within the group itself, and it is important to recognize and support leadership wherever it may come from.

Authentic leaders have many of the following characteristics:

1. Act with integrity
2. Encourage creativity and innovation
3. Listen actively
4. Manage time and resources (things and people)
5. Have patience and compassion
6. Value the members of the group
7. Achieve consensus
8. Forego the ego
9. Trustworthy
10. Communicate effectively

Of course, there are many other characteristics of authentic leaders, and if you asked someone else for their ‘top 10′ list it might look very different (I recently read a list of 50 qualities of leadership…), but these ten characteristics are undeniable, and the lack of these characteristics is what separates good leaders from ineffective ones.

 Ten Characteristics of Authentic Leaders

The Trouble with Team Projects

Team Cohesion Improves Team Performance

I used to dread “group-work” in high school. I’m sure you all know what I’m referring to – our teachers would force us to “team-up” with 3 other students to collaborate on a small group project. It was expected that this quartet of misfits would bond through shared experience, put their heads together, share the work-load equally, and come up with a product that was greater than the sum of the parts. In theory, this sounds like a fantastic team building experience – in reality, this process was doomed to failure.  Here’s what usually happened:

  • awkward silence, as the group stares blankly at people they rarely associate with, let alone work with.
  • everyone sits around and acts too cool to do the work, knowing that this group project is worth 30% of their final grade.
  • one of us takes a stab at the work, while the others sit around and scratch their heads.
  • being completely mismatched and given no instruction on how to work together effectively, the group begins to panic as the deadline approaches.
  • finally, in desperation, ‘the smart one’ in the group decides to just do the work on their own.
  • the rest of the group takes credit for the end result.

Ironically, I now work with small groups who are often put together with very little thought to how well they fit, and are expected to share the workload equally. Having the benefit of successfully implemented many teambuilding sessions, I now know what was missing back in high school.  Many teachers, while well-meaning with their intentions, simply lacked the pre-requisite knowledge of team dynamics to effectively implement a “group project.”

Here is what I have learned, and many of them were missing:

  • groups that are thrown together without some sort of formal team building exercise are generally less inclined to become a cohesive team.
  • students are usually in competition with one another for grades and class ranking (think of the “bell curve” of grading), and do not generally transition easily from competition to cooperation.  Thus, the group project is an anomoly in the classroom.
  • trusting the members of the group is one of the fundamentals of effective teamwork.  If you know you can count on others, you are more likely to risk your ideas, and listen to someone else.
  • trust is easier to gain initially than it is to regain once it has been broken.  It is, therefore, important for a leader (in this case, the teacher) to provide opportunities for that trust to be built.
  • even a simple name game or other “deinhibitizing” activity can get things rolling with team cohesion.

The similarities between group projects in high school and project management teams in an adult organizational work setting are sometimes uncanny.  A fair number of teams go through the same painful process of ineffective communication and poor performance, lacking the same pre-requisite skill set as their high school counterparts.

We’ll explore simple techniques for developing team cohesion and preparing for more effective team performance in our next blog entry.  Stay tuned!

 The Trouble with Team Projects