Let’s Not Call It Team Building

As a provider of team building, retreat facilitation, and experiential training for organizational improvement, I make a point of researching the trends in my industry.  With no shortage of information available on the internet, I am painfully aware of the confusion and the negative feedback that surrounds the ideas and the execution of activities under the umbrella of “team building”.

There are many companies that promote themselves as team building service providers.  Here are just a few I found when I did a search for ‘corporate team building’:

  • cooking
  • murder mystery
  • scavenger hunts
  • board breaking
  • bowling
  • paintball
  • fire walking
  • sailing
  • gym climbing
  • ropes courses
  • wacky olympics
  • bike building
  • pinewood derby racing
  • white water rafting

    and the list goes on…

Now, I’m a big fan of using a novel experience as part of a team building program, but I am skeptical about the level of facilitation and actual team development that goes on during these events.  If I was a client looking for a team building activity, here is what I would want to know:

What type of facilitation is going on during the ‘event?’  Do the facilitators know anything about group dynamics and team development, or are they simply experts at taking the group through the activity or experience?

How do the facilitators transfer whatever is learned during the off-site back to the real-world of the workplace?  Without some sort of debrief and discussion with regard to the group experience and the work experience, participants might as well be calling it recreation rather than team building.  Without a well facilitated discussion, the ‘team’ is not building anything!

Once you have taken part in this experience, what do you do for the follow up?  The number one complaint about even a well facilitated team building event is that while participants may have had fun and learned something about how to work more effectively as a team, as soon as they returned to the office on Monday, it was back to business as usual.  Without a proper follow-up, there is no long-term value.

Too many of these companies that offer experiences without facilitation are giving team building a bad name.  The only way a company off-site can hold any long-term value is if the experience is more than just bonding and fun.  Real value comes with building trust between the members of the group, learning how to communicate more effectively, working through conflict, and creating an environment where members are committed to the mission of the team.  When these goals are met, the team is ready to perform at its peak.

Let’s not lump together every activity that is offered for your company off-site and call it team building.  If an organizer knows the right questions to ask, they can usually differentiate between the experiences that will have lasting value and the ones that will be short-lived memories.  Although, I do have to admit – walking through fire sounds pretty cool…

The Trouble with Team Projects

Team Cohesion Improves Team Performance

I used to dread “group-work” in high school. I’m sure you all know what I’m referring to – our teachers would force us to “team-up” with 3 other students to collaborate on a small group project. It was expected that this quartet of misfits would bond through shared experience, put their heads together, share the work-load equally, and come up with a product that was greater than the sum of the parts. In theory, this sounds like a fantastic team building experience – in reality, this process was doomed to failure.  Here’s what usually happened:

  • awkward silence, as the group stares blankly at people they rarely associate with, let alone work with.
  • everyone sits around and acts too cool to do the work, knowing that this group project is worth 30% of their final grade.
  • one of us takes a stab at the work, while the others sit around and scratch their heads.
  • being completely mismatched and given no instruction on how to work together effectively, the group begins to panic as the deadline approaches.
  • finally, in desperation, ‘the smart one’ in the group decides to just do the work on their own.
  • the rest of the group takes credit for the end result.

Ironically, I now work with small groups who are often put together with very little thought to how well they fit, and are expected to share the workload equally. Having the benefit of successfully implemented many teambuilding sessions, I now know what was missing back in high school.  Many teachers, while well-meaning with their intentions, simply lacked the pre-requisite knowledge of team dynamics to effectively implement a “group project.”

Here is what I have learned, and many of them were missing:

  • groups that are thrown together without some sort of formal team building exercise are generally less inclined to become a cohesive team.
  • students are usually in competition with one another for grades and class ranking (think of the “bell curve” of grading), and do not generally transition easily from competition to cooperation.  Thus, the group project is an anomoly in the classroom.
  • trusting the members of the group is one of the fundamentals of effective teamwork.  If you know you can count on others, you are more likely to risk your ideas, and listen to someone else.
  • trust is easier to gain initially than it is to regain once it has been broken.  It is, therefore, important for a leader (in this case, the teacher) to provide opportunities for that trust to be built.
  • even a simple name game or other “deinhibitizing” activity can get things rolling with team cohesion.

The similarities between group projects in high school and project management teams in an adult organizational work setting are sometimes uncanny.  A fair number of teams go through the same painful process of ineffective communication and poor performance, lacking the same pre-requisite skill set as their high school counterparts.

We’ll explore simple techniques for developing team cohesion and preparing for more effective team performance in our next blog entry.  Stay tuned!

 The Trouble with Team Projects